The test #
Take any repeated job on the desk and ask three things.
-
Same trigger?
Does the same event always start it, or does somebody decide when to do it?
-
Same steps?
Would two consultants do it the same way, or does it depend who picks it up?
-
Same kind of output?
Is the result a fact, or is it an opinion somebody has to stand behind?
That distinction matters more in recruitment than in most trades, because recruitment sells judgement and buys its time back from everything else.
The desk, sorted #
| Job | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Taking a brief from a hirer | Judgement, but the questions themselves are fixed by regulation 18 |
| Writing the specification half of an advert | Mostly rules |
| Writing the sell half of an advert | Judgement |
| Posting to several boards and keeping them consistent | Rules |
| Acknowledging applications | Rules |
| Deduplicating applicants against your own database | Rules |
| Deciding who to shortlist | Judgement, with duties attached |
| Reformatting a CV into the house layout | Rules |
| Writing the consultant summary on that CV | Judgement |
| Collecting candidate availability | Rules |
| Proposing, confirming and reminding about interview slots | Rules |
| Preparing a candidate for a specific client | Judgement |
| Requesting compliance documents and chasing them | Rules |
| Deciding whether a document is acceptable | Judgement, and a legal duty |
| Diarising an expiry date and raising it in time | Rules |
| Producing a compliance pack for a second client | Rules |
| Chasing timesheets and approvals | Rules |
| Flagging a mismatch between booked and submitted hours | Rules to flag, judgement to resolve |
| Counting continuous weeks towards a qualifying period | Rules |
| Keeping records that can be produced on request | Rules |
| Status updates to candidates and clients | Rules |
| Delivering feedback or a rejection that will sting | Judgement |
| Aftercare in the first weeks of a placement | Prompt is rules, the call is judgement |
| Negotiating an offer | Judgement, and it is the job |
The block that is always underestimated #
Look down the rules column and the individual entries look small. That is the trap. The biggest rule-shaped cost on most desks is not any single task, it is the follow up: several hundred two-minute messages a month to candidates who have not sent a document, referees who have not replied, approvers who have not approved and hiring managers who have not given feedback.
Nobody counts those, because none of them is ever in a diary. They are the interruptions between the things that are, which is also why they damage the judgement work around them.
For a sense of scale from a study rather than an anecdote: Totaljobs research published on 15 August 2025, covering 748 HR leaders and 2,025 jobseekers, found 17.7 hours of manual admin per vacancy, more than two working days per hire, split across reviewing applications, scheduling interviews and writing up notes.
That was in house recruitment rather than agency work, and an agency carries an extra party in every one of those exchanges.
Where the line has to stay #
Three jobs on the list above are not just judgement, they carry a duty that does not move.
-
Deciding whether a document is acceptable
-
GOV.UK is explicit that you must check a job applicant is allowed to work for you before you employ them.
-
Deciding whether to supply a work-seeker at all
Arrangements around those can be tidied up, sped up and recorded better. The decisions themselves stay with people, and the liability stays with the agency regardless.
Record keeping is the flip side. Regulation 29 of the Conduct Regulations requires records to be kept for at least a year, capable of being reproduced legibly and delivered within two business days. That is a rule-shaped obligation that manual processes fail slowly and invisibly, until somebody asks.
Three ways agencies get this wrong #
- Automating a broken process. If the compliance checklist is wrong, doing it faster produces more wrong answers, sooner.
- Starting with the exception. The unusual case is the interesting one to a human and the worst place to begin. Start where the volume is.
- Confusing the duty with the scaffolding. Chasing a document is scaffolding. Judging it is the duty. Anyone who blurs those two in a sales conversation is selling you a risk.
What to do with this #
Take a week and tally the jobs in the rules column: how often each one happens and roughly how long it takes. You will have a ranked list of repeated work by the end of it, which is the only thing worth basing a decision on.
The free tools will turn those tallies into hours, and the free audit does the same exercise properly across every desk. The deepest of the individual cases is the compliance pack chase, which is where most agencies find their largest single number.